Home page

Home Page

Newton-Raphson Patterns

Updated April 2013

Introduction

The "Newton-Raphson" method is an algorithm for finding the roots of differentiable equations. See Wolfram or Wikipedia

It can be used to generate fractal images like these.

Newton Example 1 Newton Example 2 Newton Example 3

Update 2 (March 2015): The WebGL version now has an animation option. You can use this to incrementally change some of the parameters of the equation and watch how the pattern evolves.

Update (March 2015): I now have a WebGL version of the Newton Fractal drawer. This has a few disadvantages over the Native Client version, You can't zoom in as far and if you try to create very large detailed pictures the graphics card times out. However for normal use it is much faster, so for a reasonable image size and number of iterations you can use it in real time. It also works in a wider range of browsers without having to tweek the browser settings.

I haven't written up the instructions yet, but they are similar to those of the WebGL Mandelbrot program.

This native client version should still run, so long as your browser is Chrome and you've set all the flags to the correct values. If you have had this working in the past and it no longer works the new magic setting is chrome://flags/#enable-nacl which enables native client for non-AppStore applications.

You can try it (and some other native client applications) here.

Some of the images drawn with these applications are shown below.

If you only want to solve polynomials, rather than draw pictures, then visit the polynomials page.

The Patterns

The images in this section were drawn using the python script (no longer available).

Example

This image shows a situation where the iterations converge on a cycle of 2 points. It is generated using the string "e1,-2.55,0,-1 s1280x1024 i6000 b30 fpic1 l20 c.866,0 m7", which I will explain fully when I publish the application. For now it indicates that we are looking at the polynomial "x3-2.55x2-1 = 0 around the point (0.866,0). The attractors are:

    Point attractor at (-0.0691821081964128 - 0.605959771012239i)
    Point attractor at 2.68836421639283
    Point attractor at (-0.0691821081964128 + 0.605959771012239i)
    Divergent attractor, limit = 1E+20
    Cyclic attractor: 2 points
        [0] 0.889861407221087
        [1] -0.180352088426774
Alpha example

The basic Newton Raphson equation can be modified by adding in a sort of damping factor, called 'a', see the "Generalisation" section on the Wikipedia page. In my code I call this "alpha". If you perform the calculations keeping the seed point constant and varying 'a' you can get patterns like the one on the left, showing the behaviour of the simple cubic x3 = 1 with the seed value (0.1,0).

This calculation only converges when 'a' is in the circular region of radius 1 centered on the point (1,0). In the image the area outside this region is shaded grey. The white region inside this circle is the region where the calculations didn't converge. See the next image for more on this.

Alpha example

I believe that the points in the white region of the previous image would converge given time, but they have instead been identified as converging on cycles. This is a useful feature of the application as it greatly speeds up the calculations in these slowly converging regions. My guess is that the convergeance follows a very slowly shrinking spiral, which looks to the code like loops, I may investigate this at a later date.

The image on the left is the same calculation as in the previous image (x3 = 1) but this time these non-convergent points have been assigned colours according to the size of the loops they converge on. These colours as assigned at random, so I can't identify which colour corresponds to which loop size.

Alpha example

This next image zooms in on the region towards the top right of the previous image, it is centered on the point 'a' = (1.81,-0.39). I've included this because I like it, especially as you can see some interesting structure in the "cyclic" region to the right of the image.

The application parameters are "e1,0,0,-1 s1280x1024 i60000 b120 fpic1 l20 z0.1,0 m40 tA c1.81,-0.39 xI".

The cyclic colours are assigned randomly so you probably won't get exactly the same image.

Newton Mandelbrot

In this "Alpha-map" version, if you choose as you seed point a value that doesn't converge on a root in the standard version, then you can find non convergent regions that look like the Mandelbrot set.

This one was generated using "e1,-2.55,0,-1 s1280x1024 i6000 b60 fpic1 l20 z0.866,0 m30 tA c1,0" which uses the same polynomial as in the first image: "x3-2.55x2-1 = 0, with the seed point (0.866,0) and is centered around 'a' = (1,0).

Note that the Mandelbrot isn't perfect, the amount of corruption depending on the value of the seed point. There is probably a value that produces a perfect image but I haven't worked out what it is.

Bestiary

This section catalogs some of the common patterns. There are two columns, the first shows the standard iteration performed over different seed values, the second shows a example of the corresponding "alpha-map", formed by varying the 'α' parameter in the iteration Zn+1 = Zn− αF(Zn) ⁄ F'(Zn) while keeping the seed point constant.

DescriptionStandardAlpha

Two Real Roots

(z−1).(z−2)

Three Real Roots

(z+2).(z−1).(z−2)

Four Real Roots

(z+2).z.(z−1).(z−2)

Five Real Roots

(z+2).(z+1).z.(z−1).(z−2)

Five Real Roots (2)

(z+2).(z+1).(z−1).(z−2).(z−100)

Two repeated Real Roots

(z−1)2

Results are a bit random as algorithm finds two slightly different roots.

Two repeated Real Roots

(z−1)2.(z+1)

2&time;2 Repeated Real Roots

(z−1)2.(z+1)2

Three repeated Real Roots

(z+1)3

Algorithm fails completely.

 

Three repeated Real Roots)

z.(z+1)3

Algorithm finds the single root but not the repeats.

 

Two Imaginary

(z2+1)

One Real, Two Imaginary

(z2+1).(z-2)

Cyclic

900z3 − 2595z2 + 658z − 902

The small white region near the centre of the alpha plot shows the range of alpha values where the seed point (0.9) doesn't converge on a solution. If you zoom in on this region you can see that it looks very similar to the Mandelbrot set.

(c) John Whitehouse 2010 - 2015